Re: [Evolution] evo 2
jack wallen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.ximian.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
you speak as if i'm a developer. nope. i'm an actor. i'm just a huge Linux fan and have been using for a decade or so. but no developing in my life. On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 15:18, Eric Lambart wrote: > Don't knock it 'til you try it. If you still prefer the "old" > Evolution, you can always fork the codebase and start your own project. > > On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 15:08 -0400, jack wallen wrote: > > so i was reading up a bit on evo two on the footnotes site. from what > > i've read i might be glad i've not upgraded. sounds like there were some > > pretty major UI changes that, from the descriptions i've read, don't > > sound too enticing. > > > > i think what surprises me the most is that evolution stands a good > > chance at getting a toe-hold in the corporate environment. this is > > partially because it has the element of familiarity (due to it's > > similarities to outlook). but now that is changing i can imagine people > > decided to NOT migrate because it's "different" again. > > > > not only that but the debate about making it 4 separate components? > > hello!!!! that would be a serious step backwards i would think. > > > > just my .02 > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- j w e || So let go jump in a a n || Oh well what you waiting for c l j || It's alright k l r || 'Cos there's beauty in the breakdown _______________________________________________ Users maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/users