Re: command dependencies broken
Johan Holmberg <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:01:51 +0200 (MEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Timothee Besset wrote:
>
> The cvs version isn't so broken. The only issue I know about it is the
> Install / InstallAs problem (also known as command dependencies). I use
> cons from cvs patched with pcons patch all day long, and I'd just want
> this to be fixed before it's declared stable and good for a final release.
>
I'm very confused by your mail.
Have you forgotten the discussion about a month ago
(which you took part in) ?
See for example my mail:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/cons-discuss/2002-June/001898.html
The problem there applies to both 2.3.0 and the latest version via CVS.
I think it is a *very serious* bug.
I think 2.3.0 and later (including the latest from CVS) is totally
useless if you want to build anything reliably.
I though everybody agreed on that !!!??
/Johan Holmberg
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/