Re: command dependencies broken

Yes, it is an important issue obviously. But to me it doesn't look at bad
as you make it appear in your example. Basically I don't have 'chained'
dependencies, i.e. it's always a C file modified that leads to rebuilding
a .so or binary target.

The bug seems to happen on intermediate dependencies. In my case, hell
breaks loose with the Install and InstallAs methods. Sometimes it will
just decide that it's no need to rebuild the thing because it decides sort
of that the InstallAs object is present and doing just fine.

TTimo

On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:01:51 +0200 (MEST)
Johan Holmberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Timothee Besset wrote:
> >
> > The cvs version isn't so broken. The only issue I know about it is the
> > Install / InstallAs problem (also known as command dependencies). I use
> > cons from cvs patched with pcons patch all day long, and I'd just want
> > this to be fixed before it's declared stable and good for a final release.
> >
> 
> I'm very confused by your mail.
> Have you forgotten the discussion about a month ago
> (which you took part in) ?
> 
> See for example my mail:
> 
>     http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/cons-discuss/2002-June/001898.html
> 
> 
> The problem there applies to both 2.3.0 and the latest version via CVS.
> 
> I think it is a *very serious* bug.
> I think 2.3.0 and later (including the latest from CVS) is totally
> useless if you want to build anything reliably.
> 
> I though everybody agreed on that !!!??
> 
> 
> /Johan Holmberg
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/