Re: Linking against a built library

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 01:34 Australia/Melbourne, Gary 
Oberbrunner wrote:

>
> On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 04:46  AM, Lachlan O'Dea wrote:
>
>> ... I'm trying to build an executable that links against a shared
>> library that is also built by Cons.
>>
>> ...I can't see an easy way to specify that a particular program should
>
>> be linked against this library. Using LIBS doesn't fit that well,
>> since it's global and I think I have to work out the paths myself.
>> Also, since my SharedLibrary method is basically a copy of the Program
>
>> method, it also uses LIBS, which can result in a circular dependency.
>
> I suggest you use two different environments, one for building the lib
> and one for your program.  That gives you more flexibility anyway.
> Just derive one from the other and change the LIBS, and whatever else
> you need to change.

Of course, that works perfectly. I actually tried that approach when 
trying to build both static and shared versions of a library. It didn't 
work in that case because both targets depended on the same source 
files. It didn't occur to me that the problem doesn't exist in the case 
of building an executable.

Thanks!

====
Lachlan O'Dea <[email protected]>       Computer Associates Pty Ltd
Webmaster                              Vet - Anti-Virus Software
http://www.vet.com.au/                 Ich bin CA!


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE9yao9oBZahcUBONoRAqrWAJ9pB7cAqEioN1EulFBVLeXAVOJHRgCgtFub
b/sCo5xkdkxcZOopCRRZqAE=
=gpuC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/