Re: Split cons code (was: Re: Debian package and development of CONS)
Johan Holmberg <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:01:57 +0200 (MEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 [email protected] wrote: > > On Sept. 6, 2002, I submitted a message to this group that included source > that has since fixed my dependency problems with the Command method. We > have been using Cons 2.3.0 and we are very happy with the performance and > reliability. > --- > Rick Croote > Are we really talking about the same thing ? Does your patched version work better than like below ? (I tried to apply your patch, but couldn't notice any difference in this situation). Suppose you have a Construct file like: $e = cons->new(); $e->Command("tgt.txt", "src.txt", "cp %< %>"); And issue the following commands: $ echo "qwerty" > src.txt $ cons . cp src.txt tgt.txt $ cp /dev/null tgt.txt $ cons . cons.pl: "." is up-to-date. <----- should NOT be up-to-date Note that this is just a "as small as possible" example. As far as I know it is not specific to "Command", but a general problem in 2.3.0 an later (even with your patch). I would be glad to be proven wrong ... /Johan Holmberg _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/