Re: Split cons code (was: Re: Debian package and development of CONS)

--===============2002024783==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nbhHrEdisCJIsSEl"
Content-Disposition: inline


--nbhHrEdisCJIsSEl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Is it really a good idea to distribute 2.3.0 ?
> The dependency code in that version is broken.

I could distribute a CVS snapshot instead. Our first goal would then be
the correction of this critical bug...

Briefly,
le Moine Fou
--=20
[email protected]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

--nbhHrEdisCJIsSEl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/WK+sxe13INnVDYoRAnN6AJ0Rh73nRuHrTrml8N/8q0DrXVUS8QCfabUb
HB+5u8r6K+UvA1Vk6RpB7VY=
=2R6l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nbhHrEdisCJIsSEl--



--===============2002024783==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/
--===============2002024783==--