Re: Naming conventions

Thanks. I'm not used to working on code that many people will see. 
CustomAttributeBuilder is a pretty "messy" class, and I haven't gotten to the 
really weird stuff that the pseudo-custom attributes create.

marcus


On Saturday 28 August 2004 1:03 am, Gopal V wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> > Is that only for those three types? I don't see
> > "Int32" or "Single" being
> > used, for example. So I'm very confused about this
> > part.
>
> You can use "int" or "float" as you please ... That
> peice of advice is to prevent the "string" and
> "object"
> mixed with the "String" and "Object" (which are used
> everywhere else in pnet).