Re: Naming conventions
Michal Moskal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.dotgnu.developer |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 08:09:17AM +0200, Carl-Adam Brengesjo wrote: > Marcus wrote: > >Is that only for those three types? I don't see "Int32" or "Single" being > >used, for example. So I'm very confused about this part. > > Afaik, "int" is prefered to "Int32" for future backcompability on 64bit > system when "int" will be wrapped to Int64 instead of Int32. Though at > many places in the code both "int" and "Int32" are used. So I'm not 100% > sure about it. ECMA-334 C# Language Specification 11.1.4.7: The int type represents signed 32-bit integers with values between -2147483648 and 2147483647. It has nothing to do with 32/64 bit systems. t's one of reasons to use CLR -- you don't need to care about this. -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith :: GCS !tv h e>+++ b++ : ::: Logic is a nice contrast to the Real World. :: UL++++$ C++ E--- a?