Re: What happened to libtool transitive DSOs?
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, John Calcote wrote: > > After upgrading to libtool 2.4.2, I find that I now have to specify the > additional secondary .la files that are listed in the primary .la files' > dependency_libs property, or I get a link error indicating missing DSOs on > the command line (and I can see that libtool is not adding the transitive > dependencies like it used to. Why was this change made? Are you using libtool 2.4.2 as distributed by the FSF or are you using a modified libtool distributed by an OS vendor? Some OS vendors modify libtool like this on purpose. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool