Re: What happened to libtool transitive DSOs?
"Paul T. Bauman" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKiVBts0HUwhG8nz79sOKmGMzx0Mgg=R1FpE-3QDbBtdWmuV0A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:56 AM Bob Friesenhahn < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, John Calcote wrote: > > > > After upgrading to libtool 2.4.2, I find that I now have to specify the > > additional secondary .la files that are listed in the primary .la files' > > dependency_libs property, or I get a link error indicating missing DSOs > on > > the command line (and I can see that libtool is not adding the transitive > > dependencies like it used to. Why was this change made? > > Are you using libtool 2.4.2 as distributed by the FSF or are you using > a modified libtool distributed by an OS vendor? Some OS vendors > modify libtool like this on purpose. > This is correct and bit us as well when Debian-based systems changed this. Our very hackish work around was to insert the following in our configure.ac immediately after AC_OUTPUT(): perl -pi -e 's/link_all_deplibs=no/link_all_deplibs=yes/' libtool HTH, Paul _______________________________________________ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool