Re: What happened to libtool transitive DSOs?
John Calcote <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+LTics8p63L_agO883k_WpsQZJPnKKvfeLvVVgCtNA4kff6Ng@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Bob. It's an ubuntu distro release - Linux Mint 18. Why would they do that? On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 9:56 AM Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, John Calcote wrote: > > > > After upgrading to libtool 2.4.2, I find that I now have to specify the > > additional secondary .la files that are listed in the primary .la files' > > dependency_libs property, or I get a link error indicating missing DSOs > on > > the command line (and I can see that libtool is not adding the transitive > > dependencies like it used to. Why was this change made? > > Are you using libtool 2.4.2 as distributed by the FSF or are you using > a modified libtool distributed by an OS vendor? Some OS vendors > modify libtool like this on purpose. > > Bob > -- > Bob Friesenhahn > [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ > GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ > _______________________________________________ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool