Re: What happened to libtool transitive DSOs?
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > > This is correct and bit us as well when Debian-based systems changed this. > Our very hackish work around was to insert the following in our configure.ac > immediately after AC_OUTPUT(): > > perl -pi -e 's/link_all_deplibs=no/link_all_deplibs=yes/' libtool OS distributions where shared libraries provide robust implicit dependencies, and where pkg-config or other methods are used to obtain build options, do not like what libtool does. They do not like that libtool adds libraries that the application/library did not explicitly link with. The reason why they do not like this is that if they introduce a different library which has different dependencies then they would like the dependencies to be entirely determined by the new library. This is a very long-standing point of contention. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool