Re: AI is not a solution
Graham King <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2025-07-01 at 10:02 +0100, Graham King wrote: > I'm no longer professionally in IT, and never was in software > development, but I recently had an interesting conversation with two > friends who are. > Both their companies expect job candidates to use AI in their > technical > interview. Candidates who do not do so will lose credit. > My friends each use AI to inspire solutions to difficult programming > problems. > We identified a couple of issues: > 1. Where an AI-inspired solution involves major code change, the > value > of source code control is diminished, and human comprehension of the > code base can be eroded. > 2. Older programmers have "earned their stripes" and can presumably > assess AI-contributed code with their critical faculties engaged. > There is some concern whether AI will, over time, remove selection > pressure for such a skill from the programming gene pool. > Oh, and... 3. How to manage 1. and 2. in the face of commercial/economic/time pressure for hastily-implemented short-term fixes.