Re: LilyPond 2.25.34

   On 2/21/26 17:18, Dan Eble wrote:

     I have a special request this time.  If you have scores with
     unconventional time signatures or polymeter with aligned measures
     and you haven't tried 2.25 yet, please consider reading through
     [1]https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/changes/rhythm-impro
     vements
     and trying some of the enhancements.

   I cannot contribute with any suitable test cases, but with a question.
   Is there any specific reason that the ly code isn't shown in the
   example "The \time command now accepts a rational number in the
   numerator. ...", in contrast to all the other examples?

       /Mats

References

   1. https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/changes/rhythm-improvements