Re: LilyPond 2.25.34

On 2026-02-21 12:16, Mats Bengtsson via Discussions on LilyPond 
development wrote:
>     I cannot contribute with any suitable test cases, but with a question.
>     Is there any specific reason that the ly code isn't shown in the
>     example "The \time command now accepts a rational number in the
>     numerator. ...", in contrast to all the other examples?

The guidance for that document is to keep examples short, the code for 
that sample is relatively long, and the syntax is basically the same as
for the rational number in the denominator.

It might make more sense to show the denominator example first; do you 
think that would have kept you from asking the question?
-- 
Dan