Re: branch-1_4 reduce memory footprint
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.m4.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Eric, On 10 Oct 2006, at 11:34, Eric Blake wrote: > I had no idea we were hammering malloc this badly. I temporarily > instrumented > xmalloc to show usage patterns, then ran 'M4=src/m4 autoreconf -v' > to profile > the m4 configure script before and after this patch. Nice analysis! And nice patch too. Rene himself said that he thinks we abuse obstacks in the current implementation, though I never took the time to figure out how to comb out the hair. > on head, I may experiment with adding an obstack_regrow macro that > I documented in the bug-m4 list. That would be really interesting to see. Especially if it finds its way back to glibc eventually :-) Cheers, Gary - -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [email protected] Research Scientist ( '/ http://blog.azazil.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4} Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFNTOmFRMICSmD1gYRAsLtAKCkaqiwYoUQor5LG6Yt5WopiM4UrACZAdBL EBlYOioojUnA7G0CsJAw130= =exdd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----