Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting

"Gary V. Vaughan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.m4.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Eric,

On 12 Oct 2006, at 16:13, Eric Blake wrote:
> I still want CVS head to follow Solaris' parsing precedence
> rules (macros, then quotes, then comments), rather than the current  
> behavior
> (comments, macros, quotes).

Can you remind me why that is?  The first thing that happens in any
parser I'm familiar with is to discard the comments, why is it a good
thing for M4 to behave differently?  (I think I know an answer, but
I'm curious to understand your reasoning here)

Cheers,
	Gary
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  [email protected]
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4}
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFNTVZFRMICSmD1gYRAnS5AJ9tSCe1bAfTCOE+AHiwj2pAiRn6WgCgiVHK
RSJnWXfS4ZfjaIyfqrLUlg4=
=B+jV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.