Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.m4.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Eric, On 12 Oct 2006, at 16:13, Eric Blake wrote: > I still want CVS head to follow Solaris' parsing precedence > rules (macros, then quotes, then comments), rather than the current > behavior > (comments, macros, quotes). Can you remind me why that is? The first thing that happens in any parser I'm familiar with is to discard the comments, why is it a good thing for M4 to behave differently? (I think I know an answer, but I'm curious to understand your reasoning here) Cheers, Gary - -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [email protected] Research Scientist ( '/ http://blog.azazil.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4} Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFNTVZFRMICSmD1gYRAnS5AJ9tSCe1bAfTCOE+AHiwj2pAiRn6WgCgiVHK RSJnWXfS4ZfjaIyfqrLUlg4= =B+jV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----