Re: Minor Comments on Gmake Internals

On 12/18/21 11:35 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:

> My take on this is a bit different: free_variable_set is poorly named 
> and could be renamed to free_variable_set_list. There seems to be no 
> need for a separate free_variable_set function.

I don't know the code well enough to have an opinion on this, but
if we're talking about renaming things, I'd suggest considering renaming
variable_set to variable_hash, since that's what it is.

> Yes, it appears that .TARGETS is a circa 2002 idea that never got 
> published. The source code and/or commentary mentions .TARGETS twelve 
> times and perhaps these should all be looked at.

>> 3) There's a misplaced comment about popping the top set off the current
>> variable_set_list in variable.c on lines 666 and 667. It should be 
>> before line 712.
> 
> Good catch.

Which brings me to the question of how you guys like to receive changes.
Do you want a formal GitHub PR, or do you accept informal diffs on
this list, or something else?

Thanks,
Jon