Re: make ChangeLog dep.h filedef.h read.c remake.c ...
Boris Kolpackov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.make.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Code Synthesis Tools CC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Paul, Paul D. Smith <[email protected]> writes: > Nice! I'll take a look at this but it seems good. My only concern is > whether we've added enough regression tests to the suite to cover all > the issues raised by those four bugs. All four bugs were variants of the "dependency failed to update while rebuilding -include'ed makefile while another, real, target depended on it but make didn't issue any or issued bogus diagnostics". I only could think of three tests for this. > So, the question becomes: do you think we're ready for rc1 tomorrow? Or > are there more things to do such that we should hold off? I would really like to do some profiling. Plus take a look at #25780 and #25140. So maybe wait another week? Boris -- Boris Kolpackov, Code Synthesis Tools http://codesynthesis.com/~boris/blog Open-source XML data binding for C++: http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsd XML data binding for embedded systems: http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsde