Re: WSL-4.0 release candidate

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Keith Marshall wrote:
>
> I understand what you are trying to do, but in addition to this package

Which is to have a RC package that isn't delivered as the most current
by default.

> naming anomaly, there is a more serious problem: you are breaking the
> rule of package orthogonality; (no individual file should be delivered
> by more than one package).  In introducing this pair of packages, you
> are creating conflicts with the existing mingwrt and w32api packages;
> I'm afraid that current mingw-get just isn't equipped to handle any such
> scenario.

Suggestions?

-- 
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb