Re: 64-bit experiment

Dear Nighstrike,

By your response, I see I have made a poor choice of words in a few
instances. I sincerely apologize. It was not truly my intention. Please
let me clarify.

On 04-02-2017 18:28, NightStrike wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Cesar Strauss <[email protected]> wrote:
>> For w32api, I used our gendef tool on the Windows 10
>> kernel32.dll and msvcrt.dll.
> 
> ....*YOUR* gendef tool?

Sorry, I did not meant to claim authorship of Kai's work.

What I meant was:

"For w32api, I used Kai's gendef tool, distributed by us (not the
mingw-w64 gendef, which is more recent), on the Windows 10 kernel32.dll
and msvcrt.dll"

>> Going forward, we could begin to develop a proper 64-bit port of our
>> runtime and w32api.
> 
> ....*PROPER* ?  There's nothing wrong with our port.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply the mingw-w64 port was not proper.

Let me rephrase:

"Going forward, we could begin to develop a proper 64-bit port of our
runtime and w32api, as opposed to my quick hack, which is not a proper
port by any means."

Sorry again for any confusion on my part. Thank you for calling
attention to these issues.

Best regards,

Cesar


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot