Re: 64-bit experiment

Earnie <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:17:05 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 4/2/2017 5:28 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Cesar Strauss <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello,
> [..]
>> I neither looked nor used any code
>> from the mingw-w64 project
> [..]
>> For w32api, I used our gendef tool on the Windows 10
>> kernel32.dll and msvcrt.dll.
> 
> ....*YOUR* gendef tool?  Earnie copied all of Kai's code and stuck it
> in your repository, then changed all the licenses.  It's completely
> stolen.
> 

I don't remember changing licenses but the version I copied was a
different license than the one today.

>> Going forward, we could begin to develop a proper 64-bit port of our
>> runtime and w32api.
> 
> ....*PROPER* ?  There's nothing wrong with our port.
> 
>> Now, this brings the question: does our reservation against using the
>> w32api of the mingw-w64 project extends to their startup code? If not,
>> it would be much easier to simply merge back their runtime code.
> 
> Continuing Earnie's trend of stealing without credit?
> 

If there is missing credits that can be resolved.

-- 
Earnie

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot