Re: Lots of symbols in comctl32 are exported by ordinal only

Hans Leidekker <hans-p/[email protected]> Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:51:26 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.patches
Organization VU Amsterdam
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thursday 23 October 2003 01:09, Danny Smith wrote:

> When i looked for documentation on the NONAME symbols in Hans' patch, I
> couldn't find any, except for the symbols that are exported by name from
> shlwapi.dll.  Nor do we have prototypes.
> So that begs the question: shouldn't we just remove them from the import
> lib, because it looks like ordinary users are not meant to use them?

Please don't. I can understand that you don't want to support
anything Microsoft obviously doesn't want to support (it's hard
enough to support what they support). But that's from the (narrow)
perspective of building an alternative Win32 application development
environment (i.e. supporting the published Win32 API).

When you're implementing alternatives for Win32 platform libraries, 
like Wine and ReactOS are doing it's a different matter. But I agree
those are no 'ordinary users'. Personally I'd like to see MinGW support
this type of development as well.

 -Hans  



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100
http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54