Re: Reply on Burg and Welch power spectra
David Bateman <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:55:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.octave.sources |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter, Wow, the shear quantity of the comparison data is awesome... Frankly, I'm not sure I have the time to fully understand, but its seems to me from a brief reading of your message that 1) You don't think full matlab compatibility is desireable 2) Your code is more compatible that the existing code 3) Your have additional optional arguments The additional arguments are not a problem as they don't affect compatibility. Paul stated that its a pity to break compatibility with existing octave code, but I thinks its more important to adapt to the matlab interface to attract new users. As for the first point, its seems to me your the expert. I'd think that the best thing would be to replace the octave-forge functions with your new versions. Do you have a sourceforge account? If so then we should give you access to the CVS.. D. -- David Bateman [email protected] Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary