Re: Reply on Burg and Welch power spectra
Paul Kienzle <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:50:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.octave.sources |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 26, 2006, at 5:55 AM, David Bateman wrote: > Peter, > > Wow, the shear quantity of the comparison data is > awesome... Frankly, I'm not sure I have the time > to fully understand, but its seems to me > from a brief reading of your message that > > 1) You don't think full matlab compatibility is desireable > 2) Your code is more compatible that the existing code > 3) Your have additional optional arguments > > The additional arguments are not a problem as they > don't affect compatibility. Paul stated that its a > pity to break compatibility with existing octave code, > but I thinks its more important to adapt to the > matlab interface to attract new users. As for the > first point, its seems to me your the expert. > > I'd think that the best thing would be to replace > the octave-forge functions with your new versions. > Do you have a sourceforge account? If so then we > should give you access to the CVS.. I agree with David that we should provide the new versions so that new code is compatible. However, it is a pity to break compatibility with existing _Matlab_ code, even though it is from an older version. Do we want to save code compatible with R11? - Paul