Re: Order of definitions in source-highlight 2.10

Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> I've uploaded a temporary version that uses this strategy (and it also 
> performs faster as expected) here:
> 
> http://gdn.dsi.unifi.it/~bettini/source-highlight-2.10.1.tar.gz
> 
> I'd really appreciate to get some feedback, especially do you think that 
> this new strategy makes sense?

On a totally unrelated note, I notice that this new version has some 
changes to the search for Boost in the configure script - which is good, 
because I've never been able to get it to compile without passing a 
bunch of options to configure :)  But shouldn't there be a reference to 
BOOST_CPPFLAGS in src/Makefile.am (and src/lib/Makefile.am)?