Re: Order of definitions in source-highlight 2.10

[email protected] wrote:
> Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>> I've uploaded a temporary version that uses this strategy (and it also 
>> performs faster as expected) here:
>>
>> http://gdn.dsi.unifi.it/~bettini/source-highlight-2.10.1.tar.gz
>>
>> I'd really appreciate to get some feedback, especially do you think 
>> that this new strategy makes sense?
> 
> On a totally unrelated note, I notice that this new version has some 
> changes to the search for Boost in the configure script - which is good, 
> because I've never been able to get it to compile without passing a 

yes, I didn't mention that :-)
finally the autoconf macro for searching for that libary improved and 
can find that library in a smarter way :-) 
http://autoconf-archive.cryp.to/ax_boost_regex.html

> bunch of options to configure :)  But shouldn't there be a reference to 
> BOOST_CPPFLAGS in src/Makefile.am (and src/lib/Makefile.am)?

yes, probably you're right, I should add that!
The documentation found here http://randspringer.de/boost/ucl-sbs.html 
did not mention that, but I think I should add BOOST_CPPFLAGS to 
AM_CPPFLAGS.

What about the other changes?
Do you think they make sense?

cheers
	Lorenzo

-- 
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com  http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net