Re: Chromium performance

Andres Lagar Cavilla wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
>> One easy thing to do is run 'top' on the crserver host while 
>> Chromium's running to see how busy the CPU is.
> 
> 
> top with glxgears shows CPU at 99% (not too surprising). top with quake 
> 3 shows CPU steadily around 30-40%. My card is an ATI X600, not the 
> fastest, not the slowest.
> 
>> Do you have a certain configuration in mind?
> 
> 
> I was thinking about the simplest configuration: pack SPU on one side, 
> render SPU on the other side. Potentially feedback and array SPUs on the 
> client side, depending on the applications need. Regarding to my 
> previous post on dlm, is expando a potentially useful SPU, or is there 
> for the sake of debugging?

It's mostly for debugging.  I think Bob said so in his message a few 
days ago.

One thing I've toyed with is an option to remove the state tracker 
from the crserver.  It's really only needed when the crserver is 
accepting streams from multiple clients.  That could save some CPU time.

-Brian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642