VFS interface update: off64_t or uint64_t?

Eunsoo Roh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.crystalspace.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>


While updating the references after interface update, I noticed signed-unsigned mismatch warnings from g++. It turns out off64_t is defined as signed 64-bit integer, (potentially) conflicting with legacy code expecting size_t, which is a unsigned integer of platform-dependent size.
 
Anyone have any recommendations on this issue? I'm considering switching to uint64_t as this would be less destructive to legacy code.
 
Eunsoo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

_______________________________________________
Crystal-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-develop
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.