Re: "Generate" Extensions menu
"brynn" <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:02:39 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.inkscape.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9419FD01C0D148ECAC8BD0672A96EDB6@brynnPC> |
That's an interesting thought. If you look at the bug report, I listed the potential new submenus for the currently named Render. https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/1790927 So I'm just imagining about Generate from Path there. (I tend to think visually.) Yeah, I could see that working! Would you post that in a new comment? (I don't know if you're reg'd there.) brynn -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Kurn Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 1:15 PM To: Inkscape User Community Subject: Re: [Inkscape-user] "Generate" Extensions menu I suggest "Generate from Path" be a sub-menu of "Generate" Andrew On Wed 5 Sep 2018 11:31 -0600, brynn wrote: > > Thanks for your comments, C R. > > I would worry that naming it "Generate" would create confusion with the > other submenu called "Generate from Path". I wonder if another word might > be better? > > What about "Create"? Or "Draw"? Maybe "Display"??? > > All best, > brynn > > -----Original Message----- From: C R > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2018 6:36 PM > To: Inkscape User Community > Cc: inkscape-devel > Subject: Re: [Inkscape-user] improve organization of Extensions menu > > > Thanks for the work, Brynn! I'd like to suggest that the "Render" category > be changed to "Generate", because "Render" in graphics is most often the > generation of raster graphics from data (such as vectors). > > The rest of your proposal sounds good to me. > -C > > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 1:11 AM brynn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Friends, > As part of my project to get all the known external extensions listed > in > one place, and trying to organize them (using the current Extensions menu as a > starting place) I've realized that how the Extensions menu is organized might > need some improvement. I've also discussed it privately with a couple of > other > users. So I thought I'd bring up the subject with developers. > > For example. > > 1 -- Should Stylesheet be a submenu under Web? > 2 -- Should Typography be a submenu under Text? > > Currently, many extension makers seem to be making their own submenus > for their extensions. For people who use a lot of external extensions, I > wonder > if their menus are harder to use. If we had the menu already organized, it > might inspire extension makers to put their extensions into the pre-existing > submenus, rather than make their own. > > 3 -- Should there be a Gcode submenu under Export? (more about Export submenu > below) > > In my list, I've created a separate Gcode category. There are lots of > external extensions which produce gcode (approx 20). I don't know where they > would show up in the Extensions menu, yet (since I just now learned how to > find > out). But as I said, it might help keep the menu clean, to have submenus > ready > for the external extensions, even if there might not be any built-in > extensions > for some submenus. > > 4 -- Should the current Gcodetools submenu appear within this proposed Gcode > submenu? > > 5 -- To accomodate external extensions, both Render and Export need to be > divided into several submenus. > > 6 -- I've also created a new category (for my list) Animation/Presentation > (currently 10 or 12 of them). It seems like the existing JessyInk submenu > should go under there (assuming we were to agree on adding such a submenu). > > 7 -- There are 3 external extensions which comprise a Boolean category. But > shouldn't Boolean be under the existing Modify Path submenu? > > 8 -- And once I get all the external ones organized, I guess other instances > of > potentially improved organization might come to light. > > > If anyone else has any observations about improving the organization of > the Extensions menu, please feel free to make comments :-) > > Yes, I realize a lot of developers are getting ready to go to Hackfest. > But I wanted to mention this, in case it might come up. Otherwise, it can > still > be discussed, now or later. > > Thank you very much, > brynn > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Inkscape-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Inkscape-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Inkscape-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Inkscape-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot