Re: Compilation problems IPE 7.0.13 on MacOS X 10.6.5 (Qt3 vs Qt4
<Elwood151-S0/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.ipe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C97204E2.B2DD%[email protected]> |
Dear Michael, thanks for your reply! Concerning qt3 vs qt4 in MacPorts you may be right. However, at the moment I need each one for exactly one port and it sounds like a real mess to uninstall Qt4 in OS X and qt3 in macports and then reinstall both vice versa.. Can you tell me what's the difference between qt3 and qt3-mac resp. qt4 and qt4-mac in MacPorts? searching moc in qt4 finally was the solution: It is called moc-4.7, so by changing config.mak to # Settings for Mac OS 10.6 (...) MOC = moc-4.7 Then make ... worked well and I was able to install IPE 7! Thank you very much! @ Oliver Devillers: > I am using qt cocoa > http://qt.nokia.com/products/ Sorry, is that the same one I was talking about ( Qt4.7.1 with the installer DMG from here: http://qt.nokia.com/downloads/qt-for-open-source-cpp-development-on-mac-os-x Cocoa: Mac binary package for Mac OS X 10.5 - 10.6 (32-bit and 64-bit) http://get.qt.nokia.com/qt/source/qt-mac-opensource-4.7.1.dmg (206 MB, includes build and interface tools) ) If I have Qt4 installed from the DMG, can software installed via MacPorts use it? Kind regards Martin > Von: "Thon, Michael" <[email protected]> > Datum: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:07:37 +0000 > An: elwood151 <elwood151-S0/[email protected]> > Unterhaltung: [Ipe-discuss] Compilation problems IPE 7.0.13 on MacOS X 10.6.5 > (Qt3 vs Qt4 > Betreff: Re: [Ipe-discuss] Compilation problems IPE 7.0.13 on MacOS X 10.6.5 > (Qt3 vs Qt4 > > Dear Martin, > > it seems that the make script from ipe is calling the moc from Qt3 and not > from Qt4. I guess all you need to do is figure out where the moc of Qt4 > resides and set this in the MOC variable of the config.mak (I would do this > including the full path). > > By the way, you may have less hassle going the other way round (installing Qt4 > via MacPorts and Qt3 seperately), since most ports that rely on Qt will want > qt4, no? > > Michael > >