Re: The evil is out ... aPNG (Animated PNG)

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 08:01:09AM -0400, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote:

> >This whole thing looks like a reinvention of MNG-VLC.
> 
> A MNG-VLC implementation using libmng is about 75k.  MNG-LC is about 93k.

I would expect a scratch VLC implementation using just libpng (and 
probably libjpeg, since that's already in too) would be comparable to
what apng requires. Any reason that shouldn't be so?

> By comparison, libmng in mozilla-1.4 is 105k.  I have since cut it down
> to about 45k, to make room for MNG.  That didn't work though; the
> result was they ratcheted down the target size for MNG.

Ah, so that's what happened. Has anyone worked out what they actually 
have against MNG?

 -r

--
Send the message body "help" to [email protected]