Re: EXIF support in PNG

Willem van Schaik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Agreed ...

Willem


On 2017-01-01 22:02, John Bowler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Most of the EXIF data remains relevant after a format conversion.
>
>
> Perhaps the right way of describing it is to say that if the EXIF chunk
> has data that is not overridden by the PNG data then it is probably correct.
>
> The data that I want to see preserved has nothing to do with the image
> format; it is true metadata that corresponds roughly to IPTC metadata.
> I guess the specification could observe that anything that qualifies the
> image encoding must be treated with distrust, however information such
> as black level, original white point and luminance can be useful even so.
>
> --
> John Bowler <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> +1 (541) 450-9885
> PO BOX 3151
> KERBY OR 97531-3151
> USA
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> png-mng-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc
>


-- 

Willem van Schaik
<[email protected]>
http://www.schaik.com/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.