Re: cOMp chunk [was: EXIF support in PNG]

John Bowler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <CAP7U39-CV2f5-0aKu0mUbi+BvhOOfkb6QzOAG=-Mvy4_28fdHg@mail.gmail.com>
Glenn has made a number of off-thread proposals about "comp" plus the
on-thread one of moving the compression byte.  I don't see any merit
in these.  In particular the suggestion to add a keyword reveals a
complete misunderstanding of the merits of the chunk.  I do accept the
comments about the chunk not being useful because no one will
implement it so it will never be used (basically Willem's observation
about zTXt).

I had dropped the idea, nevertheless Glenn seems to have suddenly
become enthusiastic about voting on it.

Notice that the discussion was dropped for more than two weeks so
there *isn't* a comp chunk up for discussion if the new voting rules
are approved.

All the same, I will post a formal CFD for discussion, in the
(unapproved) approved format.  It will be the same as the original one
with some explanation to make it more clear why I actually suggested
it in the first place.

John Bowler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.