Re: cOMp chunk [was: EXIF support in PNG]
John Bowler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP7U39-CV2f5-0aKu0mUbi+BvhOOfkb6QzOAG=-Mvy4_28fdHg@mail.gmail.com> |
Glenn has made a number of off-thread proposals about "comp" plus the on-thread one of moving the compression byte. I don't see any merit in these. In particular the suggestion to add a keyword reveals a complete misunderstanding of the merits of the chunk. I do accept the comments about the chunk not being useful because no one will implement it so it will never be used (basically Willem's observation about zTXt). I had dropped the idea, nevertheless Glenn seems to have suddenly become enthusiastic about voting on it. Notice that the discussion was dropped for more than two weeks so there *isn't* a comp chunk up for discussion if the new voting rules are approved. All the same, I will post a formal CFD for discussion, in the (unapproved) approved format. It will be the same as the original one with some explanation to make it more clear why I actually suggested it in the first place. John Bowler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot