Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION (continued): PNG Registration Process 20170125
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXctRO=0XDK9Q2=xFqWzJqHDBO0X=U989pZLQp9SQ1OsAQQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Sorry I hit the send button while trying to delete some of the text. The point I meant to make was that nothing stops a voter from calling for a vote on an earlier version of the proposal, such as > > ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/png-group/documents/history/ > png-proposed-eXIf-chunk-2017-0115.txt > which happens to be two weeks old at this point. It'd be a little confusing not to be voting on the latest draft, but so be it. I'd vote against this one because of the problem with whether to include Exif\0\0 or not. The 2017-0115 draft seems to say include it. Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc