Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION (continued): PNG Registration Process 20170125

John Bowler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <CAP7U39--A_wTG-+ixdmSC_fmxdvN7ZQCk9yufx6K+HBsJuBFww@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry I hit the send button while trying to delete some of the text.

Yes, computers are getting less easy to use as the manufacturers claim
the opposite.

> The point I meant to make was that nothing stops a voter from calling for a
> vote on an earlier version of the proposal, such as
>>
>> ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/png-group/documents/history/png-proposed-eXIf-chunk-2017-0115.txt
>
> which happens to be two weeks old at this point.
> It'd be a little confusing not to be voting on the latest draft, but so be it.
> I'd vote against this one because of the problem with whether to include
> Exif\0\0 or not.
> The 2017-0115 draft seems to say include it.

It's fine that way.  Let's get this over with.

-- 
John Bowler <[email protected]>
+1 (541) 450-9885
PO BOX 3151
KERBY OR 97531-3151
USA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.