Re: PNG roots and farewell
影月 零 <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:40:07 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+JGUxSfhtfBf5ixcF9Sn8GTtuKQrfDgkh_pybLGJvzKaK8emg@mail.gmail.com> |
I'm not an active member of the PNG development community, nor have I contributed anything to the core PNG project, but as someone who's based a large part of an important project on an extension of PNG I think Willem has said something that I really think needs to be reiterated. The stagnation in the PNG community over the concern of purity is eventually going to strangle out PNG. That's not to say that focusing on core purity is a bad thing - in fact as many would say it's what makes PNG so good; but if that core purity is of such high concern then EXIF shouldn't even be an issue because it would mean tainting PNG. But EXIF would, as others have pointed out, allow PNG to be used in a much wider variety of very practical situations - situations PNG would not be used for without EXIF. It seems to me that this focus on purity will cause stagnation that will slowly strangle out PNG. It's already happened with animated PNG, where the push for MNG and obsession with purity has lead to something like 15 years of animated GIF dominance when an acceptance of an official APNG standard would have probably totally eliminated GIF usage by now. Exclusion of EXIF based on purity will remove using PNG as an option in a massive variety of use cases like IoT imaging devices or a default image format for mobile apps, and 15 years from now we'll look back and say "this could have been PNG if we'd only said yes!". But again, my opinion is of little value here. The developers of PNG have created something absolutely fantastic and I respect you all immensely. I just don't want to see PNG fade into obscurity or be overshadowed by other formats for things PNG could have been spectacular at. Regards and respect, -Rei 2017-02-08 14:06 GMT+09:00 Willem van Schaik <[email protected]>: > > to all you folks ... keep up the good work > > farewell !! > > Willem > > > > On 2017-02-07 21:18, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Willem van Schaik <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Glenn, how do I unsubscribe ?? not a joke !! > > > > > > I'm not the list manager, but I guess you can unsubscribe by visiting > > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc > > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc> > > > > > > I'm not encouraging you to do that, however. > > > > Glenn > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > png-mng-misc mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc > > > > -- > Willem van Schaik > [email protected] > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > png-mng-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc