DRAFT: eXIf 2017-0210
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Feb 2017 06:30:13 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcuhZA_Ox+s+5s9khpeVhzxgxuHXnH75f3gg0hTt7AY1cg@mail.gmail.com> |
DRAFT eXIf 2017-0210 http://www.simplesystems.org/png-group/proposals/eXIf/png-proposed-eXIf-chunk-2017-0210.html Glenn Randers-Pehrson In hopes of obtaining consensus on a proposed eXIf chunk, I present this DRAFT for consideration and discussion. If and when it seems appropriate I'll issue an official CFD to start the two-week countdown to the call for vote. The guts of this proposal are: The data segment of the eXIf chunk contains an Exif profile in the format specified in "4.7.2 Interoperability Structure of APP1 in Compressed Data" of [CIPA DC-008-2016] except that the JPEG APP1 marker, length, and the "Exif ID code" described in 4.7.2(C), i.e., "Exif", NULL, padding byte, are not included. It begins with either "II" or "MM", depending upon the byte order used. There are no ordering constraints upon the position of the eXIf beyond those imposed by the PNG specification, i.e., if present, the eXIf chunk may appear anywhere between the IHDR and IEND chunks except between IDAT chunks. The eXIf chunk contains metadata concerning the original image data. If the image has been edited subsequent to creation of the Exif profile, This data might no longer apply to the PNG image data. It is beyond the scope of this specification to resolve potential conflicts between data in the eXIf chunk and in other PNG chunks, to include other eXIf chunks. It is recommended that unless a decoder has independent knowledge of the validity of the Exif data, the data should be considered to be of historical value only. There is no expectation that any thumbnails present in the Exif profile have been updated (or have not been updated) if the main image was changed. Image editing applications should consider Paragraph E.3 of the Exif Specification (CIPA DC-008, Exchangeable image file format for digital still cameras), which discusses requirements for updating Exif data when the image is changed. Encoders should follow those requirements, but decoders should not assume that it has been accomplished. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot