Re: png-mng-misc Digest, Vol 60, Issue 30
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:13:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2017-02-27 16:31, Phil Harvey wrote: >> From: Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> >> No one has had anything to say about this draft. Is it time to >> restart a CFD? > I would much prefer allowing only one eXIf chunk. I don't see any cases where multiple chunks would be very useful, and they would cause me headaches when implementing a metadata writer -- I would need to add special logic to avoid duplicating information when writing to a file containing multiple eXIf chunks. I agree. unless there is a) a clear body of existing images with multiple exifs, and b) a clear description of how to interpret and modify them then it seems like extra complexity that hurts interop and gives no benefit. -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director @ W3C W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot