Re: DRAFT: eXIf 2017-03-02
Pavel Zlatovratskii <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:44:05 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | TB.Budget |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think "and/or" should be read as "or IFD[0] or IFD[1] or both". IFD[0] could be used if eXIf contains only metadata; IFD[1] could be used for preview without metadata; both - for preview and metadata. Another solution is design preview chunk and forbid IFD[1] in eXIf. 03.03.2017 7:15, John Bowler пишет: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It contains a TIFF header plus a 0th IFD (Image File Directory) >>> and/or a 1st IFD as defined in the Exif specification; the 0th IFD >>> contains pointers to an Exif sub-IFD and/or a GPS sub-IFD. The >>> optional 1st IFD contains a thumbnail image. > Why must it contain either IFD[0] or IFD[1]? > -- Have a nice DOS. Pavel Zlatovratskii [email protected]; [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc