Re: DRAFT: eXIf 2017-03-02
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Mar 2017 06:39:16 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcvhY7JnvCBh4ANi8Fgd3=HVeBaqn2eDuVxGkW6C6kx0Gw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Pavel Zlatovratskii <[email protected]> wrote: > I think "and/or" should be read as "or IFD[0] or IFD[1] or both". Yes, that is what it means. > > IFD[0] could be used if eXIf contains only metadata; IFD[1] could be > used for preview without metadata; both - for preview and metadata. Yes, that seems to be what the Exif specification allows. > > Another solution is design preview chunk and forbid IFD[1] in eXIf Sure, but why? We're simply trying to preserve Exif data, not invent more. Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot