Re: DRAFT: eXIf 2017-03-02
John Bowler <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Mar 2017 04:06:36 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP7U39-vR_g+EG72o3DsPHjNTrVAR2JqY1RQn7m6LivmAuRRJQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Pavel Zlatovratskii <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think "and/or" should be read as "or IFD[0] or IFD[1] or both". > > Yes, that is what it means. That wasn't what I asked. The *meaning* of the sentence is clear. I don't understand why the data *has* to contain *either*. -- John Bowler <[email protected]> +1 (541) 450-9885 PO BOX 3151 KERBY OR 97531-3151 USA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot