Re: DRAFT: eXIf 2017-03-02
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:01:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcuRgPBuJX3Vx7fPpj=4DY6pcV2J6Z1fV7vrD-K6V-=xnQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:50 AM, John Bowler <[email protected]> wrote: > I also don't see why I shouldn't just put the EXIF tags into IFD[0]; > the level of indirection is of no benefit in a single-image format. > Maybe CIPA2016 intends to mandate that they appear there, but I can't > be sure and, anyway, CIPA may change the spec. Interesting. Are you suggesting that an Exif profile containing only a TIFF header plus (for example) an Orientation tag, a WaterDepth tag, and a GPSAltitude tag (without any IFD0, Exif IFD, or GPS IDF tags) would be valid? It would be nice if that were so. Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot