Re: DRAFT: eXIf 2017-03-09

> 
>     On March 9, 2017 at 10:52 PM John Bowler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>     [Therefore, ...]
> 
>     This seems unhelpful. It begs the (security) question of whether the
>     gap can be detected; so far as I can see tags in the IFDs can point
>     anywhere and, so far as I can see, unrecognized tags which might point
>     anywhere (perhaps indirectly) are permitted.
> 
>     I think this is raising a whole collection of TIFF security issues
>     which should not be part of a PNG specification.
> 

OK, it's gone from the 2017-03-10 draft.  I assume you'd like me to remove

paragraph 3 of the Rationale as well, for the same reasons, and I'll

do that in the next draft.


Glenn

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned
dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an
account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and
projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition.
http://sdm.link/oxford

_______________________________________________
png-mng-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc