Re: CFD: eXIf 2017-05-31
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:31:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcvJiC6OTB3ahLh6h3=gbEB0sXrp2UcG11kR5Vq3s+Ge6g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Phil Harvey <phil-CIeU6mJ2MbMd166Dz3SrqbDks+cytr/[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> >> >> Speaking of RFC-2119: should the draft not use "should" instead of >> "must" in the paragraph that mentions the 64KB size limit? > > I would maybe suggest rewording this to put the burden on the > decoder: > > "The PNG specification allows the chunk size to be as > large as 2^31-1 bytes, so decoders should be aware that, > if the Exif profile is converted to JPEG, it may be > necessary to reduce the total length of the Exif data > to fit inside the ~64 kbyte limit of a JPEG segment." OK, and the whole paragraph can be relocated into the Recommendations for Decoders section. Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot