Re: Some general bitching and moaning
Lauris Kaplinski <[email protected]> Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:23:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.sodipodi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello! Well, we would like make program as good as possible. It is just hard, and takes a lot of time. Basically I agree with all of your feature wishes. And I think all these are in feature request pages in sourceforge as well. They will not be ignored. But as hint about development time - it took about 2 years to get path composition operations implemented... Best wishes, Lauris Kaplinski Johann Myrkraverk Oskarsson kirjutas R, 13.02.2004 kell 23:47: > Pat Suwalski writes: > > Johann Myrkraverk Oskarsson wrote: > > > Here's some more general bitching and moaning about lack of > > > features, unuasable UI and so on and so forth ;) > > > > Stop the bitching. > > Maye. > > > > Layers! I want layers! I tell you, layers! > > > > Look at archives from around Christmas. > > I just did a little search on the archives, neither 'layer' nor > 'layers' came up with anything; either it's just me, my broswer or the > sf.net search engine. > > I will rather spend some time designing/drawing than reading them one > mail at a time. > > > > Why do I always have to look at the snap grids? The checkbox to > > > make them invisible is always greyed out ;( > > > > Just because. There are more important issues. > > Perhaps, perhaps not; just make sure one of them isn't to scare off > newbies, it has hurt more projects than this one. > > > > As for gradients, is it possible to get some sort of node/handles > > > to edit them in-picture? I find the current stuff in the dialog > > > box just about unusable. > > > > That's harsh. You should stop criticizing. It's just fine as it is. If > > you can't use them, that's of no fault of the program. It works > > fine. > > No it isn't -- it's true. I can deal with it becouse I don't need > that feature at the moment but my short battle with it so far make me > doubt it's worth my time when I might. > > > > some sort of perspective transformation, aka. gimp, would be very > > > nice. > > > > Do your research before complaining. Yes, just like in CorelDraw: click > > the object once, then once again and use the horontal/vertical > > arrows. > > No. I have *never* used CorelDraw -- deal with it. This is shearing, > not perspective transformation aka gimp. In gimp I place each corner > of a rectangle manually, this could perhaps work with the node tool, > but aparently it doesn't work on groups. Shearing is not the best > tool to place texture/images in perspective when the rest of the image > is. > > [...] > > Johann ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click