Re: Some general bitching and moaning

Lauris Kaplinski <[email protected]> Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:23:00 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.sodipodi
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello!

Well, we would like make program as good as possible. It is
just hard, and takes a lot of time.
Basically I agree with all of your feature wishes. And I think
all these are in feature request pages in sourceforge as well.
They will not be ignored. But as hint about development time
- it took about 2 years to get path composition operations
implemented...

Best wishes,
Lauris Kaplinski


Johann Myrkraverk Oskarsson kirjutas R, 13.02.2004 kell 23:47:
> Pat Suwalski writes:
>  > Johann Myrkraverk Oskarsson wrote:
>  > > Here's some more general bitching and moaning about lack of
>  > > features, unuasable UI and so on and so forth ;)
>  > 
>  > Stop the bitching.
> 
> Maye.
> 
>  > > Layers!  I want layers!  I tell you, layers!
>  > 
>  > Look at archives from around Christmas.
> 
> I just did a little search on the archives, neither 'layer' nor
> 'layers' came up with anything; either it's just me, my broswer or the
> sf.net search engine.
> 
> I will rather spend some time designing/drawing than reading them one
> mail at a time.
> 
>  > > Why do I always have to look at the snap grids?  The checkbox to
>  > > make them invisible is always greyed out ;(
>  > 
>  > Just because. There are more important issues.
> 
> Perhaps, perhaps not; just make sure one of them isn't to scare off
> newbies, it has hurt more projects than this one.
> 
>  > > As for gradients, is it possible to get some sort of node/handles
>  > > to edit them in-picture?  I find the current stuff in the dialog
>  > > box just about unusable.
>  > 
>  > That's harsh. You should stop criticizing. It's just fine as it is. If 
>  > you can't use them, that's of no fault of the program. It works
>  > fine.
> 
> No it isn't -- it's true.  I can deal with it becouse I don't need
> that feature at the moment but my short battle with it so far make me
> doubt it's worth my time when I might.
> 
>  > > some sort of perspective transformation, aka. gimp, would be very
>  > > nice.
>  > 
>  > Do your research before complaining. Yes, just like in CorelDraw: click 
>  > the object once, then once again and use the horontal/vertical
>  > arrows.
> 
> No.  I have *never* used CorelDraw -- deal with it.  This is shearing,
> not perspective transformation aka gimp.  In gimp I place each corner
> of a rectangle manually, this could perhaps work with the node tool,
> but aparently it doesn't work on groups.  Shearing is not the best
> tool to place texture/images in perspective when the rest of the image
> is.
> 
> [...]
> 
> Johann



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click