Re: Phil meet y-devel; y-devel meet Phil
Ulrik Mikaelsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.y.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | BTH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Monday 19 July 2004 02.30 skrev Andrew Suffield: > >> <shrug> Your own silly fault for buying the wrong > >> hardware. Reverse-engineer it if you really care. > > > > Hmm, pardon me if I'm wrong, but isn't there a rabid > > manufacturer of graphics > > chips out there that threatens to sue everyone who tries to > > make a driver for > > their chip? > I wonder which one. Hmmm... Rabies.... Unfortunately I can't seem to find an old news item I read about 1.5 years ago, I think it was on http://www.xig.com. It suggested that Xig once tried to get the hardware specs from nVidia in order to support it in their AX-product but were, as expected, denied access to the specifications. According to the article, Xi Graphics then proceeded by using the specs found in XFree86 as a starting-point, and then reverse-engineered the rest in order to get a decent beta-level support for amongst other cards, the GeForce2. The article suggested that Xi graphics were then contacted by nVidia, warning them not to reverse-engineer their Intellectual Property, threating to file a lawsuit unless the support was dropped. This article, coming from Xi Graphics should of course be considered with a healthy doze of scepticism. But what CAN be seen today is that there are no support whatsoever for GeForce cards in Xig:s X-server. Not even the basic support that could easily be added by the information found in the nv-driver from XFree86, that seems to be ok with nVidia. And if you trust my word and my memory, I know I saw both this article, as well as beta-support for GeForce2, and a note about all this at the page http://www.xig.com/Pages/Atop/HardwareSupportInSummit/NVIDIAsupport.html Somehow it seems to have magically disappeared. :-/ Well, well. I guess we'll all have to stick to the damn binary, proprietary, sucky nvidia.ko kernel module, along with a black-box XFree-driver. Personally, I'm considering to try out the new Radeon cards, and see what ATI have been up to this years. I'm probably in for disappointment, but since I'm used to the nVidia-drivers, I think I can take it. Anyone running a somewhat fresh Radeon-card under Linux (and 2.6) that can tell me how it's working for you? Regards / Ulrik - -- All men have the right to wait in line. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA+/2E069SELtZwIkRArIMAJ9IQlzYl4NnfDGHflOLPF/W4jMVjgCePGlo hFdJAVOuyEJZIOXVXrHO+/4= =UmDg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----