Re: Quick question... Is this project dead?!

On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:02:49PM +0200, Kimmo Sundqvist wrote:
> On Sunday 02 January 2005 00:24, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > Just refer to the last "Is this project dead??" thread ;-)
> 
> > http://www.y-windows.org/pipermail/y-devel/2004-September/001736.html
> 
> I hope the developers would at least say something about their progress.  Once 
> a month, maybe?

There hasn't been any in the past month because we've all been doing
other things. I don't see why you expect anything different. Nor is
your demand for progress reports appropriate or even good manners; you
are not middle-management for any of us.

> It is much possible that they know all the best ideas and want no input or 
> discussion, and it is also possible that they want to surprise us.  Finally, 
> it is possible that once they have something ready, swarms of beta-testers 
> will emerge out of nowhere to help them after a single announcement.

All of that stuff is grossly premature.

> Where were the arch access instructions again?

Read the manual.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB2OAclpK98RSteX8RAgfXAJoDFjlsnfnikhkXTc3dkkgNu2dOOwCgjMPF
OeJQRR8cH6WhGk4OOcTZAwU=
=BN8N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----