FW: dual sleeves in intimate?
"James Conner" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.linux.intimate |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----Original Message----- From: James Conner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 18 December 2001 14:37 To: Chris Jones Subject: RE: [Intimate] dual sleeves in intimate? Loading the kernel is only half of the battle.. We also need to configure whatever pcmcia cards the user has... (i.e. potentially hundreds of different network cards, ip addresses etc). All of this would need to be handled by bootloader/kernel. At the moment, cardmgr is not built into the kernel. I understand that there's no plans to include it either. All we use familiar for at the moment is kernel, modules and pcmcia support (i.e. cardmgr etc). If all of the pcmcia stuff was in the kernel, then we don't need familiar on flash... Tho' I have to ask what else you'd put on there. You still need a kernel and modules stored on flash, so that rules out CE... (Unless you plan on booting from CE, which already works... just without power management). All intimate needs to boot is kernel+pcmcia support.. It doens't matter if it's a ramdisk, cramfs, jffs2, familiar, kiss, CE or whatever... just as long as we get the root filesystem mounted (potentially over NFS) and pivot_root to it. Feel free to mess around tho'.. I'd love to see so alternative ways to boot. Jim / Tangent -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Chris Jones Sent: 18 December 2001 14:13 To: Sanghyo Kim Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Intimate] dual sleeves in intimate? Hi * Sanghyo Kim ([email protected]) wrote: > If not, can I install initmate on familar 0,5 instead > without any problem? I had to fiddle with the names of some of the kernel modules to get intimate to work properly with dual sleeves, I think the familiar guys changed some of the module names. To the Intimate developers - are there any plans to change the way Intimate sits on top of Familiar? It's not an ideal system at the moment - given that the bootldr can now load a kernel from within a jffs2 image, shouldn't it be possible to bypass Familiar almost entirely? Cheers, -- Chris "Ng" Jones [email protected] www.linuxdude.co.uk