Re: FW: dual sleeves in intimate?
Chris Jones <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.linux.intimate |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi * James Conner ([email protected]) wrote: > All we use familiar for at the moment is kernel, modules and pcmcia support Which seems fine, but it's not really all that simple because all of those things then need to be kept in sync between Familiar and Intimate, so every time I upgrade the kernel (which I tend to do only through Familiar's kernel updates, rather than build my own) I have to make sure that Intimate has all the matching kernel modules it is going to need later in the boot, or pre-load them while Familiar is still in charge. Personally I don't mind doing that, upgrading the kernel on my PC has accumulated far more nuances, but I'd like to know that an apt-get dist-upgrade has really upgraded everything, I'm not going to have to reboot into Familiar just to run an ipkg upgrade for kernel/pcmcia. Two OSes and two package managers seems a bit much for a little PDA ;) > don't need familiar on flash... Tho' I have to ask what else you'd put on > there. Well, I'm coming at this very much from what is probably not an especially common point of view - I don't ever take the dual sleeve off my iPAQ, so I don't ever have to worry about what it's going to boot into without a hard disk. That means I realise you're going to say "nice idea, but most people don't see the iPAQ as a portable workstation, it's a PDA!" ;) Anyway, the only improvement (for me at least) I can think of would be to have a jffs2 image which basically contains /boot, but with pcmcia stuff as well. This would stay mounted after the Intimate root has been mounted, much as /boot on a PC would (stuff like the pcmcia packages would be installed into that partition and then be symlinked back to wherever they would live normally). > You still need a kernel and modules stored on flash, so that rules > out CE... (Unless you plan on booting from CE, which already works... just > without power management). I would quite like to see dual-booting become easier, but I have no need for Windows in my pocket, so I'll ignore that :) > Feel free to mess around tho'.. I'd love to see so alternative ways to boot. I'm a long term Red Hat user, so all this Debian stuff is a bit new to me. I'll have a play around and see if I can come up with anything. Obviously I don't expect it to be used too widely because I suspect most people use their iPAQs without sleeves some of the time. Cheers, -- Chris "Ng" Jones [email protected] www.linuxdude.co.uk